The Article Our Corrupt Home Secretary, Theresa May, Tried To Censor.

Peter Reynolds

This Woman Is A Threat To Britain. She Must Be Stopped At All Costs. This Woman Is A Threat To Britain. She Must Be Stopped At All Costs.

Reproduced in full below is a Daily Telegraph article by Jonathan Foreman which was pulled after pressure from Theresa May’s leadership campaign.

Theresa May Is A Great Self-Promoter, But A Terrible Home Secretary

In the run-up to the 2015 election, one of the handicaps David Cameron had to finesse was the fact that net migration to the UK was three times as high as he had promised it would be. Remarkably, none of the opprobrium this failure provoked brought forth the name of Theresa May, the cabinet minister actually entrusted with bringing migration down. Then, as now, it was as if the icy Home Secretary had a dark magic that warded off all critical scrutiny.

The fact that her lead role in this fiasco went unnoticed and unmentioned likely reflects Mrs May’s brilliant, all-consuming efforts to burnish her image with…

View original post 845 more words


We all know that women aren’t sexist.

We all know that women aren’t sexist,

Because there are no primary school rules stopping boys from wearing skirts/dresses, no women enforce these rules and NO, and we mean Absoloutley NO Boys ever commit suicide because they feel alienated because they want to wear a dress. (This is sarcasm with bile)

Politics FAILED

We need a new government.
The tories set up the referendum, thier leader backed remain and LOST!
Sodd off telling us to accept the result, the tories need to accept the result. They lost. And on something this big, with a new leader that the public, that the business community arn’t pleased or impressed with, this calls for a general election.
And let me help you out with “OOh, we can’t have another referendum” “OOh we can’t challenge the referendum result”,
The mandate on which the tories were voted in has changed,
Teresa may can’t start up grammar schools.
Teresa may can’t be prime minister when the country didn’t vote her in.
teresa may can’t proceed with a version of brexit that business and the public don’t agree with.
The tories can’t start trying to implement racist policies akin to the nazi party.
Oh wait, what’s that, The tories can do anything they want? because….. because…..
(Wow, censored my own post 😉 )
One rule for some, another rule for others.
If we get a new government, that government will then decide what to do, and as for no’s and can’t, and ifs, and buts, sod off, it’s not as though that is how politics works.
On June the 23rd politics failed.
With the rise in hate crime, that is not a government being successful.
With the referendum result going against cameron, that was not the government being succesful.
Doctors electing to strike, that is not a successful government.
Business uncertainty, at a time when we are barley, if at all out of recession IS NOT SUCCESSFUL GOVERNMENT.
This government is a failed government.
Shout that as much as possible.

Know that you are racists, anarchists and that you do not care for the opinions of 16/17 year olds.

Speaking to a seventeen year old, it is clear to me that they do not want to leave the European Union.

Given the statistics garnered from the referendum, which shows a clear and marked slide of opinion, with those younger generally being more in favour of the E.U, we cannot in all good conscience go ahead with leaving the E.U.

There has been dissent, disquiet from the country following the E.U Referendum.

There has been violence in the form of racist attacks, which if they stood alone would be upsetting enough, but after all the Polish have gone (The Polish community appear to have bourne the brunt of Racism, though other ethnic groups have suffered), who next? The Romanians, the Pakistanis, the Indians, then who next? Well, I voted to remain in the E.U, perhaps i will be the next target on the list.

This is not a country we can accept, this government (Cameron/May/Tory) is a failure.

A 52/48 split in the vote does not give a clear winner, 52/48 is a close split and given any set of alternate circumstances the result may have been very different, and we are talking, that if the Referendum had been held six months later, then that would have been a slew of newly 18 year olds, given the stats showing that younger people were more likley to vote remain that could have swung the result the other way. If we take out the racists then that makes the result less than 52% for leave. If we take out the anarchists who just wanted to vote against David Cameron and his failing government, that would have made the result less than 52%.


Hell, if it had been a warm sunny day that could have made a difference to a result this close.


We must not in all good conscience roll over and accept a misleading E.U referendum result.

If you want honesty, if you want the E.U referendum result to be respected then do that, and know that you are supporters of racism and anarchists. know, that you do not care for the wishes of 16 and 17 year olds. Know that you have no respect ot dignity.



Bad politics

The E.U referendum was/is bad politics, good politics unite people and provide a coherent cohesive move forward, bad politics divide people and show no clear forward plan. Good politics provide peace and prosperity, bad politics incite violence and insecurity.